Amazing Spider - Man 2 was a pretty successful movie — but it was n’t the blockbuster Sony was hoping for , and Amazing Spider - Man 3 got delayed . Meanwhile , we keep hearing some off - the - wall Spideyspin - offideas . But over inForbes , Scott Mendelson says there ’s one wanton way to save the Spidey film .
First off , before anybody else says it , the perception that Spidey is in trouble is massively pontifical . No Spider - Man moving picture has ever failed to do well . It ’s rightful the rebooted films have somewhat underperformed the Tobey Maguire trilogy , with ASM2 fix around $ 700 million instead of the nearly $ 900 million Spider - Man 3 made .
But Mendelson enounce the simplest way to save the Spider - Man movies is just to keep build Spider - Man movies , since they always do well . The one originative proposition he offers is to do a movie about Miles Morales , who ’s become Spidey in the Ultimate Spider - Man comics . But generally , he says , “ The worst affair Sony could do is panic and over guess it . ” The character remains incredibly popular , and does n’t involve an “ flourish universe ” or a complicated mythos involve OsCorp .

Instead , they should just make Amazing Spider - Man 3 , and make it a good standalone film . He writes :
Do n’t interest about attach the plastic film into an expanded universe of discourse . Do n’t care about drown in continuity . Free from the burden of wonder - fashion synergism and free from the requirement of justify a rooter - favorite plot of ground turn , director Marc Webb and his amazing Friend can just say a ripping stand - alone Spider - Man risky venture , one no more tied to set continuity than a The Spy Who Loved Me or transformer : Age of Extinction . And for goodness saki keep the budget under $ 200 million if at all possible , so even if you still end up at $ 700 m worldwide no one has to panic .
He also has an interesting twisting on why Amazing Spider - Man 2 was kind of a batch :

When you listen to the film producer ’ comment on the blu light beam you realize that the core tale flaw of the second Amazing Spider - Man film ( a ikon I mostly enjoyed ) was the choice to kill Emma Stone ’s Gwen Stacy . They made that call at the root and then basically wrote the pic backwards to justify that sequence both narratively ( lend in the Green Goblin in the name of generator faithfulness , offering a secondary villain in the descriptor of Electro in fiat to have activeness sequences prior to Osbourne ’s transmutation ) and thematically ( going uproariously out of its way to free Peter of any responsibility in his lady friend ’s violent slaying ) . The idea that the film was a back door cowcatcher to a Sinister Six character celluloid , or that it suffered from villain overburden , was more about the merchandising than the actual last production .
When you look at ASM2 as a film that ’s hobbled by the decision to shoot down off Gwen and the build the full movie around that plot exploitation , instead of severalise a story and deciding Gwen ’s fate as a result of that , it kind of makes mother wit .
The whole matter is absolutely worth read . [ Forbes ]

ComicsMarvelMoviesSonySpider - ManSuperheroes
Daily Newsletter
Get the best technical school , science , and culture news in your inbox daily .
News from the future tense , delivered to your present .
You May Also Like











![]()
